Sammy, do you think Kristina is a goat? Give me 3 reasons and explain why her game is better than yours.
Both, please compare each juror, including yourselves and your final opponent to a big brother contestant and briefly explain why. If you are unfamiliar, compare with animals (tho bb contestants is preferred)
I think that if I were to call anyone a goat, that'd be a supreme lack of perspective on my part. In my opinion, I really have no authority on stating whether a player is easily beatable in the end because I don't know the whole story. I don't know every move that Kristina made, and I don't know exactly what the jury thinks about her. I can guess, sure, I kind of have to. But I think there are two types of people who have the authority to declare whether someone is a goat or not: the jury and the viewers.
But, if you do have to have my opinion, no, I don't think Kristina's a goat at all. She's made her fair share of really smart plays that brought her to this point. I think she had a lot of really good breaks, to be sure, but I have too.
tl;dr: nah, I don't think Kristina's a goat.
The 3 regards where I think Kristina played better than me:
1. I think her endgame was pretty top notch. While Kristina started off incredibly poorly and nearly went home (particularly around Ashley's eviction), she found a way to recover under Jonas's wing and she coasted to final 5 with ease.
2. Whenever Kristina was up against anyone as a final nominee, Kristina always found a way to stay. I think this is a credit to her social game and her ability to seem as a non-threat, when compared to people like Ashley and Gucci especially.
3. I also feel like Kristina has a great ability to adapt. She was absolutely thrown into a lot of hurdles from the beginning of this game, and she found a way to jump over those hurdles, make solid alliances, and she found her way to the end, for good reason.
JURY/BB PLAYER COMPARISONS!
-Mitch, you remind me of a BB3 Jason Guy-type player. I think your social game was great and your strategic game wasn't too bad either. I think the sole reason you did go out during the early phases of jury was because we all recognized that you were such a great player and such a likable guy.
-Nate is kind of like a Hayden Moss to me. I think he is very well skilled physically, and while less-nuanced people will think that's all he's got, Nate will show you that he's tremendous strategically as well as socially. There's a reason this fool won twice.
-When I think of Jacob, I think of great social and strategic play. I think he represents an old-school player extremely well, so I'm kind of feeling a sort of less maniacal Danielle Reyes. He's smart, savvy, and quick on his feet when it comes to adapting to the flow of the game, and I think he had a great chance of getting much further in the game. -Honestly, Gucci reminds me of a Johnny Mac kinda guy. Deadass, Johnny Mac is my favorite player for so many reasons personality-wise. But talking strictly gameplay, Johnny Mac was able to be UTR despite there being no reason for him to actually be able to survive. He SHOULD'VE had a huge target on his back, but he was able to make great relationships and alliances with his phenomenal social game. He was winning competitions, making relationships, and thriving under the radar. As I said before, he was my pick to win at final 8.
-Vergi's ability to seemingly transform his gameplay near the endgame reminds me a lot of Ian Terry. Vergi found himself nominated on day 1 (thanks to me whoops) because he was such a wildcard for me. Once he was able to survive that first vote, he was off and running and he literally only got better the more he went to the end. He won competitions, got around socially, and found himself in a power position before his eviction at final 5.
-When I think of Jamie I think of strong social and under the radar play, so I gotta say Jordan Lloyd from BB11. I think there's a lot of reasons that Jordan Lloyd beat Natalie, and Jamie really exemplified all of those reasons for me. Under the radar to the point where you wouldn't have even known what hit you. Jamie didn't wrong a damn person in the jury, and that's why I had to take her out.
Thanks for the questions C:
