|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2016 19:01:13 GMT -5
I THOUGHT THE JURY IS NEVER WRONG. don't ask why I'm yelling i don't know either They're not tbh, I just would have liked to have seen her get more votes than Will. Same with Dawn getting 2nd over Sherri, but that's the way it goes sometimes. ive seen close to half the seasons of survivor but if you or someone can shine some light on how the whole "jury is never wrong" thing came about? Why can't they be wrong in their decisions?
|
|
|
Post by Jhonmarco on Feb 16, 2016 19:02:17 GMT -5
I agree with your overall point, but I don't think strategy can ruin your social game or that the jury will be tough to buy social gameplay. i think strategy DOES impact your social game because if you're the head honcho making all the strategical decisions then people can see you as a threat and get rid of you early. Like "damn, this dude knows what he's doing, I'm gonna let him do the strategy until I can cut him" Marcus from Gabon Savage from both seasons Plenty of others as well. I think that's why it's better to be more subtle about it and appear nonthreatening, but people didn't think Savage was running things in SC. They just disliked him the most from that alliance.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2016 19:04:08 GMT -5
They're not tbh, I just would have liked to have seen her get more votes than Will. Same with Dawn getting 2nd over Sherri, but that's the way it goes sometimes. ive seen close to half the seasons of survivor but if you or someone can shine some light on how the whole "jury is never wrong" thing came about? Why can't they be wrong in their decisions? The game of survivor is to make it to the end and have the people who made the jury vote for you. There's no rules on how or why the Jury should/should not vote for a certain person. So technically the Jury can never be wrong. If a jury on a certain season collectively decides to vote for the worst person in the FTC then that's how they vote. They Jury can't be wrong because the Jury decides the rules.
|
|
|
Post by Jhonmarco on Feb 16, 2016 19:06:31 GMT -5
They're not tbh, I just would have liked to have seen her get more votes than Will. Same with Dawn getting 2nd over Sherri, but that's the way it goes sometimes. ive seen close to half the seasons of survivor but if you or someone can shine some light on how the whole "jury is never wrong" thing came about? Why can't they be wrong in their decisions? Pretty much because they make the criteria on who should win and who they wanna vote for. I don't think they have to vote for a specific player just because they were more aggressive or more well liked, etc. Not one jury is the same and I think it's the job of the finalists to know the people they played with and what they wanna hear at ftc. The name of the game has always been people you had a hand in voting out will vote for who they want. I know some jurors have said they'd change their votes after the season, but that's also seeing an edited show and things from a totally different perspective. I mean there have been choices I've been disappointed with like I would have liked to see Dawn get 2nd, but that's me saying that as an outsider looking in. I wasn't betrayed by her or irritated by her like everyone else was. That's the way I look at it though.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2016 19:07:03 GMT -5
I get that your opinion can't be wrong per say, but it's still a tragedy that the most deserved sometimes don't win
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2016 19:08:20 GMT -5
I get that your opinion can't be wrong per say, but it's still a tragedy that the most deserved sometimes don't win I hold this sentiment tbh.
|
|
|
Post by Brooke on Feb 16, 2016 20:20:41 GMT -5
Oh no I didn't know the results. Thanks Stan. I thought you had quoted me. your notification would've popped up you trying to be relephant she-devil I'm on mobile and don't check those here.
|
|
|
Post by Brooke on Feb 16, 2016 20:22:49 GMT -5
I get that your opinion can't be wrong per say, but it's still a tragedy that the most deserved sometimes don't win Clearly knowing this final three though, Mike played the better game. Were you referring to this season somehow or in general?
|
|
|
Post by Helen of Troy on Feb 16, 2016 20:23:11 GMT -5
I mean I don't really agree with the 2nd place thing cause there is always room for disaster like in Nicaragua.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2016 20:25:03 GMT -5
I get that your opinion can't be wrong per say, but it's still a tragedy that the most deserved sometimes don't win Clearly knowing this final three though, Mike played the better game. Were you referring to this season somehow or in general? i meant as a whole
|
|
|
Post by Jhonmarco on Feb 16, 2016 20:42:28 GMT -5
I mean I don't really agree with the 2nd place thing cause there is always room for disaster like in Nicaragua. What do you mean?
|
|
|
Post by Helen of Troy on Feb 16, 2016 20:44:36 GMT -5
I mean I don't really agree with the 2nd place thing cause there is always room for disaster like in Nicaragua. What do you mean? I mean wasn't it a 5-4 vote despite everyone on the jury wanting fabio to win and 4 of them all thought they would throw away their only vote to make sure sash got 3rd
|
|
|
Post by Jhonmarco on Feb 16, 2016 20:52:20 GMT -5
I mean wasn't it a 5-4 vote despite everyone on the jury wanting fabio to win and 4 of them all thought they would throw away their only vote to make sure sash got 3rd Oh I mean either way people wanted to give Chase 2nd place lol. I'd consider it more of a problem if Chase won on accident.
|
|
|
Post by Nate on Feb 16, 2016 23:44:28 GMT -5
Dawn did NOT deserve 2nd over Sherri. Y'ALL DONT WANNA GET ME STARTED ON QUEEN SHERRI
|
|
|
Post by Helen of Troy on Feb 16, 2016 23:46:32 GMT -5
Dawn did NOT deserve 2nd over Sherri. Y'ALL DONT WANNA GET ME STARTED ON QUEEN SHERRI I do wanna get you started on pleb Sherri, what did she do?
|
|
|
Post by Nate on Feb 16, 2016 23:47:57 GMT -5
Dawn did NOT deserve 2nd over Sherri. Y'ALL DONT WANNA GET ME STARTED ON QUEEN SHERRI I do wanna get you started on pleb Sherri, what did she do? Overcame actual obstacles unlike Dawchran.
|
|
|
Post by Helen of Troy on Feb 16, 2016 23:49:44 GMT -5
I do wanna get you started on pleb Sherri, what did she do? Overcame actual obstacles unlike Dawchran. Got carried to the end because she was a sheep? She controlled nothing Dawn had a voice and was just as big a factor as Cochran
|
|
|
Post by Jhonmarco on Feb 16, 2016 23:53:08 GMT -5
Dawn was the one who formed those close relationships and had to break then and betray people and get her hands dirty. I mean what did Sherri do to even get more credit than Dawn or Cochran? Like I mean she did well on the fans tribe and had the awareness to get close to the power duo, but I mean if she isn't gonna try to take much control or power she could have at least had a decent social game.
|
|
|
Post by Nate on Feb 16, 2016 23:53:12 GMT -5
Overcame actual obstacles unlike Dawchran. Got carried to the end because she was a sheep? She controlled nothing Dawn had a voice and was just as big a factor as Cochran Cochran was handed the win by production and in turn, Dawn was handed second place. Sherri ran her original tribe, and had the social awareness it took to latch herself to the power players when she would have gone home had she not. When you're going to be Pagonged by the most boring original tribe in the history of Survivor, becoming a sheep to the obvious rigged winner is an honorable strategy. I loved her game. It's severely underrated.
|
|
|
Post by Jhonmarco on Feb 16, 2016 23:54:25 GMT -5
Like I'm all for people who played underrated games, but that isn't Sherri at all.
|
|