|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2015 17:26:53 GMT -5
Jupiter, the claim you are making is Colby had no shot in hell at winning the game with his selection to the final 2. When the vote is 4-3 that means jurors were extremely close to picking Colby. I can guarantee you in an alternate universe had Colby won that season, You would be saying Wesson doesn't deserve it, just because Wesson lost by a 4-3 vote, which you claim to be equal to a 9-1 No. I am saying that had he could've won had he'd taken Keith. Just like Woo could've won had he taken Kass. Both could've won their seasons had they took the easier route. Who they were and how they played is irrelevant because that's not what I am talking about here. And I'm not saying anything is equal to anything. I'm saying it doesn't matter altogether. They both lost regardless and they both could've avoided that. You don't know this.
|
|
|
Post by Jhonmarco on Sept 2, 2015 17:49:47 GMT -5
It does, Colby knew what he was doing and how that could lose him the game and he still nearly won by a vote. Even aside from that, those two played different games in general. You are literally just comparing them because of one decision.Exactly. And I'm not wrong in that comparison either. You can't sit here and tell me that Colby wouldn't have won with Keith and Woo wouldn't have won with Kass. IN THAT PARTICULAR SENSE they are the same. Nope, one game move doesn't make people the same.
|
|
|
Post by Coke on Sept 2, 2015 20:23:24 GMT -5
Keith Famie for Survivor 37: Secon Chance 2. Make it happen.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2015 0:42:16 GMT -5
No. I am saying that had he could've won had he'd taken Keith. Just like Woo could've won had he taken Kass. Both could've won their seasons had they took the easier route. Who they were and how they played is irrelevant because that's not what I am talking about here. And I'm not saying anything is equal to anything. I'm saying it doesn't matter altogether. They both lost regardless and they both could've avoided that. You don't know this. Tina and Colby both dragged his a** to the end because they knew both of them would beat him in the FTC. He was going to lose to Colby and Tina so yeah I do know that.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2015 0:46:54 GMT -5
Exactly. And I'm not wrong in that comparison either. You can't sit here and tell me that Colby wouldn't have won with Keith and Woo wouldn't have won with Kass. IN THAT PARTICULAR SENSE they are the same. Nope, one game move doesn't make people the same. In that particular situation and in that one particular move yes it does. They are different everywhere else. I don't get what's so hard to understand about that. But whatever. We'll just agree to disagree.
|
|
|
Post by Jhonmarco on Sept 3, 2015 1:02:35 GMT -5
Because it's an empty comparison, but yeah let's move on.
|
|
|
Post by briqsquad on Sept 12, 2015 18:31:22 GMT -5
I dont think Russell is a bad player, I just think he has a few screws to work on in his game to be an all time great... But I think he is too cocky/arrogant to change his game. He's got strategy down like none other and can win some comps but he just needs to not be an a**hole and he's also very impulsive which is very bad socially and even strategically.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2015 14:31:43 GMT -5
Jenn from this past season really made me mad when she gave that stupid little speech to the jury. I really felt like she was trying to tell the jury how to feel and whom to vote for in a unnecessary way and I feel like it's not really her place to tell people the "rules of the game" and to "stop being bitter" especially when she just gave up halfway through the game. Everyone on the jury has their vote and can use any criteria they want in casting their vote for the winner. Let people vote for whomever they want for whatever reasons they want.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2015 14:40:18 GMT -5
Jenn is apart of the jury, she can say whatever she want to whom ever she want
|
|
|
Post by Jhonmarco on Sept 16, 2015 14:50:03 GMT -5
Yeah those speeches suck and we've been getting more and more of them recently. Jenn is allowed to make them or whatever she feels the need to say at ftc, but they still suck.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2015 20:36:21 GMT -5
Jenn is apart of the jury, she can say whatever she want to whom ever she want But still...don't tell people how to feel or vote. It's just the pushing of the opinion that I don't like.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2015 20:39:35 GMT -5
You're right. I just feel like you extremely contradicted yourself in your post is all
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2015 21:58:11 GMT -5
You're right. I just feel like you extremely contradicted yourself in your post is all Don't see how I did but okay.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2015 23:03:11 GMT -5
You're right. I just feel like you extremely contradicted yourself in your post is all Don't see how I did but okay. " I really felt like she was trying to tell the jury how to feel and whom to vote for in a unnecessary way and I feel like it's not really her place to tell people the "rules of the game" and to "stop being bitter" especially when she just gave up halfway through the game. " " Everyone on the jury has their vote and can use any criteria they want in casting their vote for the winner" You state your opinion on how unnecessary she was in jury, then state that the jury can use any criteria they want. So yeah, contradiction
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2015 23:17:01 GMT -5
Don't see how I did but okay. " I really felt like she was trying to tell the jury how to feel and whom to vote for in a unnecessary way and I feel like it's not really her place to tell people the "rules of the game" and to "stop being bitter" especially when she just gave up halfway through the game. " " Everyone on the jury has their vote and can use any criteria they want in casting their vote for the winner" You state your opinion on how unnecessary she was in jury, then state that the jury can use any criteria they want. So yeah, contradiction I don't see how that's a contradiction. Nobody else on the jury tried to push their opinion on people like Jenn did. That's what I had a problem with. Yes people can use any criteria they want...as far as voting for whomever in the final 3. Not stupid grandstanding like she did.
|
|
|
Post by Nate on Sept 16, 2015 23:58:59 GMT -5
Jenn's annoying and was a walking contradiction the entire season. She was b*tchy to Nina, and talked about how annoying Shirin was, and then later acted like everyone else was disgusting for not liking Shirin. Then she lays around and says she doesn't want to play anymore, and then yells at the jury for "disrespecting the game" when she was the most disrespectful player to the game on the entire cast.
|
|
|
Post by Jhonmarco on Sept 17, 2015 1:14:07 GMT -5
Jenn's annoying and was a walking contradiction the entire season. She was b*tchy to Nina, and talked about how annoying Shirin was, and then later acted like everyone else was disgusting for not liking Shirin. Then she lays around and says she doesn't want to play anymore, and then yells at the jury for "disrespecting the game" when she was the most disrespectful player to the game on the entire cast. Jenn only showed disgust when people took things too far with Shirin, Jenn just thought she was annoying. Nina was annoying as sh*t though and I don't know how people act like Jenn was wrong when Nina victimized herself. Her jury speech is still awful tho
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2015 13:25:02 GMT -5
Jenn's annoying and was a walking contradiction the entire season. She was b*tchy to Nina, and talked about how annoying Shirin was, and then later acted like everyone else was disgusting for not liking Shirin. Then she lays around and says she doesn't want to play anymore, and then yells at the jury for "disrespecting the game" when she was the most disrespectful player to the game on the entire cast. Exactly.
|
|
|
Post by briqsquad on Dec 28, 2015 5:50:15 GMT -5
I dont like malcom
|
|
|
Post by Jhonmarco on Dec 28, 2015 5:56:15 GMT -5
|
|