|
Post by Jhonmarco on Sept 1, 2015 23:08:25 GMT -5
Honestly, Woo wasn't awful. It's just that I don't think he deserves a second chance in this format of a season over people like Shane, Max, or even Jim motherf*cking Rice. Because he made a dumb, dumb decision and I don't think he's smart enough to really change his game up too much. I agree with this. When I saw that he made it on to Second Chances I didn't get it. He was little else but a modern-day Colby. Shane really should have gotten his spot. Ew, Colby and Woo aren't comparable at all. Colby knowingly made a choice from a sure win to a close one, while Woo thought he'd win and got 1 out of 9 votes.
|
|
|
Post by Coke on Sept 1, 2015 23:12:36 GMT -5
Looking back on it, I think if it was edited more evenly, it could've been a very good season. Maybe the negativity brings it down a bit still, but I mean I liked some of the more unlikable people on the cast. Like Dan and Rodney. My unpopular opinion that may be popular but IDK: Dan Foley makes GREAT television. I think that'd be possible if Dan went out a lot earlier, but they just piled on him being awful and we deal with him until f6. The back and forth with him and Probst was uncomfortable too, as you could see Jeff getting pissed. His original scenes in Escameca were fun though. See I think the exact opposite of you on this topic. I think seeing him being absolutely horrible and portrayed as such made him even better of a character in my eye. Especially with him getting voted out the way he did. I thought his interaction with Jeff was hilarious, and I'll even go as far as saying Jeff was kind of a d*ck at the reunion. I think Dan is great for the same exact reasons you think he's horrible. He made a great villain and I think his character entry in the Funny 115 will be gold.
|
|
|
Post by Jhonmarco on Sept 1, 2015 23:24:39 GMT -5
I think that'd be possible if Dan went out a lot earlier, but they just piled on him being awful and we deal with him until f6. The back and forth with him and Probst was uncomfortable too, as you could see Jeff getting pissed. His original scenes in Escameca were fun though. See I think the exact opposite of you on this topic. I think seeing him being absolutely horrible and portrayed as such made him even better of a character in my eye. Especially with him getting voted out the way he did. I thought his interaction with Jeff was hilarious, and I'll even go as far as saying Jeff was kind of a D*CK at the reunion. I think Dan is great for the same exact reasons you think he's horrible. He made a great villain and I think his character entry in the Funny 115 will be gold. I would agree if he got voted out or at least put in his place by someone else and that didn't happen. By the time it happens, damage has been done already. Idk I remember Jeff getting mad that Dan claimed foul play with editing and Jeff made Dan look like an idiot on TV because Dan was indeed lying. I think there are so many other hilarious people/moments from seasons 21-30 so hope not. This could be a new top 10 though with top 10 entries for funny 115 part 3
|
|
|
Post by Coke on Sept 1, 2015 23:26:59 GMT -5
See I think the exact opposite of you on this topic. I think seeing him being absolutely horrible and portrayed as such made him even better of a character in my eye. Especially with him getting voted out the way he did. I thought his interaction with Jeff was hilarious, and I'll even go as far as saying Jeff was kind of a D*CK at the reunion. I think Dan is great for the same exact reasons you think he's horrible. He made a great villain and I think his character entry in the Funny 115 will be gold. I would agree if he got voted out or at least put in his place by someone else and that didn't happen. By the time it happens, damage has been done already. Idk I remember Jeff getting mad that Dan claimed foul play with editing and Jeff made Dan look like an idiot on TV because Dan was indeed lying. I think there are so many other hilarious people/moments from seasons 21-30 so hope not. This could be a new top 10 though with top 10 entries for funny 115 part 3 He'll have a "The Fall of _____" entry more than likely. I don't see it any other way, and if he doesn't, then the Funny 115 has failed me.
|
|
|
Post by Jhonmarco on Sept 1, 2015 23:28:09 GMT -5
I would agree if he got voted out or at least put in his place by someone else and that didn't happen. By the time it happens, damage has been done already. Idk I remember Jeff getting mad that Dan claimed foul play with editing and Jeff made Dan look like an idiot on TV because Dan was indeed lying. I think there are so many other hilarious people/moments from seasons 21-30 so hope not. This could be a new top 10 though with top 10 entries for funny 115 part 3 He'll have a "The Fall of _____" entry more than likely. I don't see it any other way, and if he doesn't, then the Funny 115 has failed me. In order for there to be a fall, there'd have to be a rise...
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2015 23:37:02 GMT -5
I agree with this. When I saw that he made it on to Second Chances I didn't get it. He was little else but a modern-day Colby. Shane really should have gotten his spot. Ew, Colby and Woo aren't comparable at all. Colby knowingly made a choice from a sure win to a close one, while Woo thought he'd win and got 1 out of 9 votes. Eh. They're the same to me. Both made dumb decisions that cost them the win.
|
|
|
Post by Nate on Sept 2, 2015 0:03:15 GMT -5
Ew, Colby and Woo aren't comparable at all. Colby knowingly made a choice from a sure win to a close one, while Woo thought he'd win and got 1 out of 9 votes. Eh. They're the same to me. Both made dumb decisions that cost them the win. The difference is Colby controlled the game from start to finish, while Woo was...there.
|
|
|
Post by Jhonmarco on Sept 2, 2015 0:04:16 GMT -5
And Colby still had a chance to win with the move he made, Woo didn't.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2015 0:07:44 GMT -5
woo is bae stfu.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2015 8:03:15 GMT -5
Eh. They're the same to me. Both made dumb decisions that cost them the win. The difference is Colby controlled the game from start to finish, while Woo was...there. It doesn't matter. BOTH had someone they could've won against but didn't take that person and ended up losing because they went with the other. Everything else is irrelevant.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2015 8:07:28 GMT -5
And Colby still had a chance to win with the move he made, Woo didn't. But had he taken Keith he would've won easily. Just like had Woo taken Kass he would've won easily.. That's the point I'm making here.
|
|
|
Post by Coke on Sept 2, 2015 8:11:22 GMT -5
And Colby still had a chance to win with the move he made, Woo didn't. But had he taken Keith he would've won easily. Just like had Woo taken Kass he would've won easily.. That's the point in making here. The difference is that he had a chance to beat Tina. Woo had no chance against Tony.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2015 8:12:28 GMT -5
But had he taken Keith he would've won easily. Just like had Woo taken Kass he would've won easily.. That's the point in making here. The difference is that he had a chance to beat Tina. Woo had no chance against Tony. Well obviously he didn't because he lost.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2015 11:56:01 GMT -5
The difference is that he had a chance to beat Tina. Woo had no chance against Tony. Well obviously he didn't because he lost. Obviously he did with it being a 4-3 vote with him losing by one rather a 9-1 vote
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2015 12:51:45 GMT -5
Well obviously he didn't because he lost. Obviously he did with it being a 4-3 vote with him losing by one rather a 9-1 vote Once again. It doesn't matter.
|
|
|
Post by Jhonmarco on Sept 2, 2015 12:55:48 GMT -5
It does, Colby knew what he was doing and how that could lose him the game and he still nearly won by a vote. Even aside from that, those two played different games in general. You are literally just comparing them because of one decision.
|
|
|
Post by Coke on Sept 2, 2015 13:11:04 GMT -5
I've heard that Colby wanted to come off in a more heroic light compared to some of the people from the last season. So taking Tina was kind of because of that I believe.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2015 14:45:40 GMT -5
Jupiter, the claim you are making is Colby had no shot in hell at winning the game with his selection to the final 2. When the vote is 4-3 that means jurors were extremely close to picking Colby.
I can guarantee you in an alternate universe had Colby won that season, You would be saying Wesson doesn't deserve it, just because Wesson lost by a 4-3 vote, which you claim to be equal to a 9-1
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2015 16:43:12 GMT -5
Jupiter, the claim you are making is Colby had no shot in hell at winning the game with his selection to the final 2. When the vote is 4-3 that means jurors were extremely close to picking Colby. I can guarantee you in an alternate universe had Colby won that season, You would be saying Wesson doesn't deserve it, just because Wesson lost by a 4-3 vote, which you claim to be equal to a 9-1 No. I am saying that had he could've won had he'd taken Keith. Just like Woo could've won had he taken Kass. Both could've won their seasons had they took the easier route. Who they were and how they played is irrelevant because that's not what I am talking about here. And I'm not saying anything is equal to anything. I'm saying it doesn't matter altogether. They both lost regardless and they both could've avoided that.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2015 16:53:15 GMT -5
It does, Colby knew what he was doing and how that could lose him the game and he still nearly won by a vote. Even aside from that, those two played different games in general. You are literally just comparing them because of one decision.Exactly. And I'm not wrong in that comparison either. You can't sit here and tell me that Colby wouldn't have won with Keith and Woo wouldn't have won with Kass. IN THAT PARTICULAR SENSE they are the same.
|
|