|
Post by Joey on Apr 6, 2015 13:15:12 GMT -5
Why was Russell allowed to participate in this season. Like at the point that I'm watching it, Jerri is trying to side with Russell. You're not supposed to f*cking trust him. He's a super villain. But of course no one knew that. They should've at least showed people highlights of the sh*t that he did, because no one seeing his game before definitely gave him an unfair advantage. You're literally not supposed to "trust" anyone on Survivor but that's how you win the game lol plus Russell WAS a super villain so that's why he was allowed to compete on Heroes vs. VILLAINS.
|
|
|
Post by afstallion13 on Jun 1, 2015 17:25:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2015 11:46:26 GMT -5
Just finished watching this season last night.
Its the best I've seen so far by a wide margin.
I really like Tyson as a character. Rupert is still great in my book. Parvati is bae and should have won. I don't think Sandra played a good game. Russell is crazy. I really don't think he had much of an advantage playing back to back because he was so loud about what he was doing.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2015 11:56:53 GMT -5
Just finished watching this season last night. Its the best I've seen so far by a wide margin. I really like Tyson as a character. Rupert is still great in my book. Parvati is bae and should have won. I don't think Sandra played a good game. Russell is crazy. I really don't think he had much of an advantage playing back to back because he was so loud about what he was doing. Finally someone else agrees with me about Sandra.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2015 21:35:32 GMT -5
Just finished watching this season last night. Its the best I've seen so far by a wide margin. I really like Tyson as a character. Rupert is still great in my book. Parvati is bae and should have won. I don't think Sandra played a good game. Russell is crazy. I really don't think he had much of an advantage playing back to back because he was so loud about what he was doing. f*ckIN THANK YOU. Every ones praising Sandra but all she literally did was swing back and forth back and forth and people only like to credit her when they need to win an argument. She did sh*t all. Her personality is great and I like that she dumps rice and stuff, but she had no business winning again
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2015 21:39:59 GMT -5
Just finished watching this season last night. Its the best I've seen so far by a wide margin. I really like Tyson as a character. Rupert is still great in my book. Parvati is bae and should have won. I don't think Sandra played a good game. Russell is crazy. I really don't think he had much of an advantage playing back to back because he was so loud about what he was doing. f*ckIN THANK YOU. Every ones praising Sandra but all she literally did was swing back and forth back and forth and people only like to credit her when they need to win an argument. She did sh*t all. Her personality is great and I like that she dumps rice and stuff, but she had no business winning again Didn't watch her original season yet but I feel like she only won because she was the least "villanous" of the villains. Bitter juries are the worst, and HvV being mostly heroes was so dumb.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2015 21:48:13 GMT -5
f*ckIN THANK YOU. Every ones praising Sandra but all she literally did was swing back and forth back and forth and people only like to credit her when they need to win an argument. She did sh*t all. Her personality is great and I like that she dumps rice and stuff, but she had no business winning again Didn't watch her original season yet but I feel like she only won because she was the least "villanous" of the villains. Bitter juries are the worst, and HvV being mostly heroes was so dumb. I'm sorry for the spoiler. And I agree about the bitter jury thing
|
|
|
Post by Jhonmarco on Jun 6, 2015 21:51:37 GMT -5
Juries are always bitter, it's up to the finalists to get them to vote for them despite what they may have done to them. Parvati and Russell failed to do so and thus, didn't deserve to win. Sandra never needed to play some flashy, blindsides galore game and it's clearly worked well for her as she's won twice.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2015 21:59:37 GMT -5
Juries are always bitter, it's up to the finalists to get them to vote for them despite what they may have done to them. Parvati and Russell failed to do so and thus, didn't deserve to win. Sandra never needed to play some flashy, blindsides galore game and it's clearly worked well for her as she's won twice. ok.
|
|
|
Post by Nate on Jun 7, 2015 2:14:14 GMT -5
I just don't get how people can watch a game about social relationships and know fully well that at the end it all comes down to how the jury perceives you and still act like the winner didn't deserve to win.
It's like saying a college basketball team didn't deserve to win because all the good players on the other team were suspended for public intoxication. They f*cked up, therefore their team doesn't deserve to win.
Russell was a crazy sack of sh*t and has no social skills therefore he did not deserve to win either time he made the FTC.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 7, 2015 8:37:56 GMT -5
So Jhon and Nate you two legit think Sandra played a good game?
|
|
|
Post by Joey on Jun 7, 2015 9:21:00 GMT -5
Russell should have won Samoa hands down, Natalie rode his coattails but Parvati should have won HvVs, Sandra's strategy was to hop back and forth between alliances and Russell was being played like a fiddle by Parv.
|
|
|
Post by Nate on Jun 7, 2015 10:57:13 GMT -5
So Jhon and Nate you two legit think Sandra played a good game? No winner, even Bob deserves to be described as having a bad game. Was her game below most winners? Yes.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 7, 2015 11:47:31 GMT -5
I didn't say she didn't deserve to win. Parvati just deserved it more IMO.
|
|
|
Post by Jhonmarco on Jun 7, 2015 11:47:34 GMT -5
So Jhon and Nate you two legit think Sandra played a good game? I think she did, Sandra has this great quality where she is very sassy, but still genuine and has great relationships with people. It can make her seem like a goat (which Russell though along with her passive play). It's also worth noting while getting the heroes support by reminding them how much she tried to help them, she also had a good shot against some of the heroes too at ftc.
|
|
|
Post by Jhonmarco on Jun 7, 2015 11:50:18 GMT -5
Russell should have won Samoa hands down, Natalie rode his coattails but Parvati should have won HvVs, Sandra's strategy was to hop back and forth between alliances and Russell was being played like a fiddle by Parv. Nah if that was the case Parvati wouldn't have had Danielle voted out at f7 (her closest ally and what ended her game). Parvati relied on Russell a lot and then wanted to spin like she controlled him. Natalie knew the kind of person she was dealing with and let him feel like he was in control. Idk why people look down at utr/passive strategy when it's just as legit as any other strategy.
|
|
|
Post by Nate on Jun 7, 2015 11:52:55 GMT -5
It's easy to hate on UTR games because they aren't as flashy or fun to watch, but it's a very smart strategy depending on who you're taking to the end. Like in Natalie's case...a very smart strategy.
|
|
|
Post by Jhonmarco on Jun 7, 2015 12:06:24 GMT -5
It's easy to hate on UTR games because they aren't as flashy or fun to watch, but it's a very smart strategy depending on who you're taking to the end. Like in Natalie's case...a very smart strategy. And it works out a lot: Danni, Natalie, Sandra, Ethan, Vecepia, Amber, etc
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 7, 2015 16:41:32 GMT -5
Why are you guys assuming that we only view it this way because she played an UTR game?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 7, 2015 16:44:08 GMT -5
So Jhon and Nate you two legit think Sandra played a good game? No winner, even Bob deserves to be described as having a bad game. Was her game below most winners? Yes. Why do they not deserve to be described as having a bad game? Who makes these rules up? Its okay to be honest and say someone played a bad game even though they won.
|
|