|
Post by hollylockets on Sept 5, 2013 13:02:39 GMT -5
Terrible...just awful gameplay by the 5 amigos. 4 amigos, but by your logic it should be 6, you forgot Jimmy, which is understandable.
|
|
|
Post by Alice on Sept 5, 2013 13:03:33 GMT -5
Oh your hilariously dumb Kenny
Nah we didn't do sh*t, didn't win 15 comps between the 4 of us, didn't take everyone else out(- Holly), and most definitely didn't make the final 4 together, because if were as bad as you say then that could never happen.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2013 13:03:44 GMT -5
I don't think they were bad, they made it to the end so they played the better game.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2013 13:04:41 GMT -5
Terrible...just awful gameplay by the 5 amigos. 4 amigos, but by your logic it should be 6, you forgot Jimmy, which is understandable. Jimmy was on the outs of that alliance so no not 6. I remember Stan throwing him under the bus.
|
|
|
Post by Alice on Sept 5, 2013 13:04:52 GMT -5
Holly you should feel special, you weren't even in the game when the 4 Amigos were formed and you still get called one!!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2013 13:06:22 GMT -5
Oh your hilariously dumb Kenny Nah we didn't do sh*t, didn't win 15 comps between the 4 of us, didn't take everyone else out(- Holly), and most definitely didn't make the final 4 together, because if were as bad as you say then that could never happen. Who did you compete against that would be considered good? Like if I beat saraj10 15 times in challenge trivia that wouldn't make me good.
|
|
|
Post by hollylockets on Sept 5, 2013 13:07:28 GMT -5
Holly you should feel special, you weren't even in the game when the 4 Amigos were formed and you still get called one!! Because we all love each other! <3 I just was just clearly too big of a threat. <3
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2013 13:13:18 GMT -5
I don't think they were bad, they made it to the end so they played the better game. Who are you to judge good gameplay?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2013 13:14:40 GMT -5
I don't think they were bad, they made it to the end so they played the better game. Who are you to judge good gameplay? It's a free country
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2013 13:14:43 GMT -5
If you have people competiting for 2nd., 3rd, and 4th then I would not consider that good gameplay.
|
|
|
Post by hollylockets on Sept 5, 2013 13:14:44 GMT -5
I don't think they were bad, they made it to the end so they played the better game. Who are you to judge good gameplay? I agree with Alaina actually, I thought they played a great strategic game as a team, and clearly dominated in a lot of the challenges. That's kind of the whole game, as far as I know.
|
|
|
Post by hollylockets on Sept 5, 2013 13:16:31 GMT -5
If you have people competiting for 2nd., 3rd, and 4th then I would not consider that good gameplay. They weren't competing for 3rd and 4th. They just got too comfortable with where they THOUGHT they stood within their alliance, it's a mistake they made, but it doesn't mean they just gave up and said "Okay, I'll take 3rd place."
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2013 13:18:27 GMT -5
If you have people competiting for 2nd., 3rd, and 4th then I would not consider that good gameplay. They weren't competing for 3rd and 4th. They just got too comfortable with where they THOUGHT they stood within their alliance, it's a mistake they made, but it doesn't mean they just gave up and said "Okay, I'll take 3rd place." Stan said he was competiting for 2nd.
|
|
|
Post by hollylockets on Sept 5, 2013 13:18:59 GMT -5
They weren't competing for 3rd and 4th. They just got too comfortable with where they THOUGHT they stood within their alliance, it's a mistake they made, but it doesn't mean they just gave up and said "Okay, I'll take 3rd place." Stan said he was competiting for 2nd. That's not what I was told.
|
|
|
Post by Alice on Sept 5, 2013 13:19:45 GMT -5
Oh your hilariously dumb Kenny Nah we didn't do sh*t, didn't win 15 comps between the 4 of us, didn't take everyone else out(- Holly), and most definitely didn't make the final 4 together, because if were as bad as you say then that could never happen. Who did you compete against that would be considered good? Like if I beat saraj10 15 times in challenge trivia that wouldn't make me good. Oh yes wait with you it's all about how well someone is know for being great in comps. Most of this seasons cast were newer members, Dara didn't come onto the site wearing a sign that said "Competition Beast". She earned that record. I think your not giving enough credit to the people who were on this season Kaitlyn- We all know she can be good and fast at live comps, and she is typically pretty good in general at comps. Kenny- You have had your moments, you say you don't think your that good but you have the ability to do good. Jimmy- I can say from hosting the ILM missions Jimmy really isn't all that bad in comps when he actually shows up. Belen- Belen's pretty well rounded when it comes to comps Ken- Nothing else needs to be said Stan- He did hold back comp wise this season, He can do good Outlast- Doesn't seem too bad at comps, future forum game winner <3 Kyle- Wasn't really here that much, but could have done aight Holly- I think she's good at comps. not like a beast but does well Just because it was not against people like Dara, Nate, Brooke etc.. doesn't mean they were a bunch of SaraJ's
|
|
|
Post by hollylockets on Sept 5, 2013 13:21:05 GMT -5
Holly- I think she's good at comps. not like a beast but does well I think there's a compliment in there somewhere. Thanks! <3
|
|
|
Post by Alice on Sept 5, 2013 13:24:29 GMT -5
Holly- I think she's good at comps. not like a beast but does well I think there's a compliment in there somewhere. Thanks! <3 I think you social/strategical game outweighed your comp side in Survivor 3 Bur I didn't get to see your comps score, I'll have to go look
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2013 13:25:42 GMT -5
Stan said he was competiting for 2nd. That's not what I was told. I feel like they were content with coming in 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. "I played for 2nd honestly, because I did not care if Alice or myself won. "
|
|
|
Post by hollylockets on Sept 5, 2013 13:29:47 GMT -5
I think there's a compliment in there somewhere. Thanks! <3 I think you social/strategical game outweighed your comp side in Survivor 3 Bur I didn't get to see your comps score, I'll have to go look Well yeah, I've always thought it was Strategic Game > Social Game > Challenge Game. They're all important, and I give challenges my all, but really, it's the strategic people who control the whole game and the social players who win if they make it to the end.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2013 13:31:17 GMT -5
Who did you compete against that would be considered good? Like if I beat saraj10 15 times in challenge trivia that wouldn't make me good. Oh yes wait with you it's all about how well someone is know for being great in comps. Most of this seasons cast were newer members, Dara didn't come onto the site wearing a sign that said "Competition Beast". She earned that record. I think your not giving enough credit to the people who were on this season Kaitlyn- We all know she can be good and fast at live comps, and she is typically pretty good in general at comps. Kenny- You have had your moments, you say you don't think your that good but you have the ability to do good. Jimmy- I can say from hosting the ILM missions Jimmy really isn't all that bad in comps when he actually shows up. Belen- Belen's pretty well rounded when it comes to comps Ken- Nothing else needs to be said Stan- He did hold back comp wise this season, He can do good Outlast- Doesn't seem too bad at comps, future forum game winner <3 Kyle- Wasn't really here that much, but could have done aight Holly- I think she's good at comps. not like a beast but does well Just because it was not against people like Dara, Nate, Brooke etc.. doesn't mean they were a bunch of SaraJ's You're giving people way too much credit here. Ken is good at UC comps, Kaitlyn is not good at BB style missions unless its a puzzle, Holly didn't try, Kyle didn't try, and I only competed in the endurance HOH.
|
|