|
Post by James on Jun 28, 2017 14:52:12 GMT -5
There were strategic implications in that vote i wrote about them in my diary!!@
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2017 14:53:55 GMT -5
Nah
|
|
|
Post by James on Jun 28, 2017 14:55:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Jhonmarco on Jun 28, 2017 15:04:52 GMT -5
"do numbers scenarios for a potential merge coming soon come into play when deciding who needs to leave this round when almost anyone is fair game to vote out?"
Pretty much. Merge is 1-2 rounds away at the most and getting your ideal group of people there is essential. That's probably why big names are being throw around for this vote.
|
|
|
Post by briqsquad on Jun 28, 2017 15:07:51 GMT -5
There were strategic implications in that vote i wrote about them in my diary!!@ Taking your closest ally out?? :swaggyp: how did that work out?? :thinking:
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2017 15:08:15 GMT -5
Pms say other ways James
|
|
|
Post by James on Jun 28, 2017 15:11:11 GMT -5
My closest ally has always been and will always be DScott since March 2016 .
|
|
|
Post by James on Jun 28, 2017 15:14:34 GMT -5
There were strategic implications in that vote i wrote about them in my diary!!@ Taking your closest ally out?? :swaggyp: how did that work out?? :thinking: I went out at like 9 despite controlling the whole pre-merge and Stan social gamed his way into being 1 IC away from winning the game despite not having numbers so. Idk who the real threat is at this point.
|
|
|
Post by briqsquad on Jun 28, 2017 15:15:55 GMT -5
Taking your closest ally out?? :swaggyp: how did that work out?? :thinking: I went out at like 9 despite controlling the whole pre-merge and Stan social gamed his way into being 1 IC away from winning the game despite not having numbers so. Idk who the real threat is at this point. obiv not me you genius
|
|
|
Post by James on Jun 28, 2017 15:16:40 GMT -5
i mean im not voing you im votin for [redacted] lmao
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2017 15:19:22 GMT -5
Split votes aren't fun James
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2017 15:20:16 GMT -5
Taking your closest ally out?? :swaggyp: how did that work out?? :thinking: I went out at like 9 despite controlling the whole pre-merge and Stan social gamed his way into being 1 IC away from winning the game despite not having numbers so. Idk who the real threat is at this point. sammy being a huge threat helped because people needed to be there to take him out. Just how I need to be here to take you out, me and Briq both will make sure that happens
|
|
|
Post by James on Jun 28, 2017 15:21:37 GMT -5
Take me out for dinner or like vote me out 😥
|
|
|
Post by briqsquad on Jun 28, 2017 15:24:26 GMT -5
Take me out for dinner or like vote me out 😥 I like to wine and dine before I f*ck you over tbh
|
|
Kaitlyn
3-Time Champ
I definitely don't like you.
Posts: 7,908
|
Post by Kaitlyn on Jun 28, 2017 17:39:10 GMT -5
I'm not. The possibility of idols is not impacting my vote
|
|
|
Post by James on Jun 28, 2017 17:40:19 GMT -5
You literally cannot play around idols when theres 15 people and 15 potential idols
|
|
Kaitlyn
3-Time Champ
I definitely don't like you.
Posts: 7,908
|
Post by Kaitlyn on Jun 28, 2017 18:21:05 GMT -5
You literally cannot play around idols when theres 15 people and 15 potential idols Precisely
|
|
|
Post by Nate on Jun 28, 2017 20:40:24 GMT -5
🤔🤔🤔 that's a debbie from KR attitude tbh
|
|
|
Post by pepper on Jun 28, 2017 21:53:35 GMT -5
heh
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2017 22:37:52 GMT -5
Ashley (@rbiash ), how solid are bonds and loyalties that have been formed either in the game or prior to the game? It seems like quite a few bridges have been burned already.
I mean there are solid bonds formed prior to games and in them... what else can I say here? thats the game. I've done both in all my survivor days
|
|