|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2013 18:16:32 GMT -5
How are you even going to compare them? Dan is one of the best BB players ever, unless Holly did some things that shocked the players in the game, then that's different. Daniel in terms of immunity challenges is probably the best competitor to ever play Nate's Survivor. He deserves the title of Sole Survivor. He won five immunity challenges. I'm going to actually use your own words here...."just because someone has won multiple competitions doesn't make them a great player of the game." I believe that was the reason you didn't vote me to win BB. Jamie was the X-Factor to your alliance. Because of her, you knew about our side of the alliance... Me, DB, YM, and Ken. I admit had we gone back in time, I would've picked you to win BB2, JC really alternated my vote (I still don't know why). In this case, which I don't know much about, I'd go with Daniel since he blew the competition away. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2013 18:16:39 GMT -5
Holly doesn't need to apologize to anyone, everyone got what was coming.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2013 18:17:58 GMT -5
Holly doesn't need to apologize to anyone, everyone got what was coming. Let me know what Holly did in this game SB, what makes her better than Daniel? I didn't pay attention to the threads close enough. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2013 18:26:55 GMT -5
Let me know what Holly did in this game SB, what makes her better than Daniel? I didn't pay attention to the threads close enough. She managed to get all of my alliance members out one by one despite the fact that she was a target in the beginning of the game. And she made it to the final two. That's a HUGE accomplishment! |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2013 18:27:56 GMT -5
Let me know what Holly did in this game SB, what makes her better than Daniel? I didn't pay attention to the threads close enough. She managed to get all of my alliance members out one by one despite the fact that she was a target in the beginning of the game. And she made it to the final two. That's a HUGE accomplishment! Okay then, thats impressive. It should be close. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2013 18:31:53 GMT -5
If that's the case then Ian deserved the win more than Dan on BB14.... How are you even going to compare them? Dan is one of the best BB players ever, unless Holly did some things that shocked the players in the game, then that's different. Daniel in terms of immunity challenges is probably the best competitor to ever play Nate's Survivor. He deserves the title of Sole Survivor. He won five immunity challenges. For me it is far more impressive to play a strategic game than winning a bunch of missions. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2013 18:32:38 GMT -5
Funny how me getting voted out changed the course of the game completely.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2013 18:34:27 GMT -5
How are you even going to compare them? Dan is one of the best BB players ever, unless Holly did some things that shocked the players in the game, then that's different. Daniel in terms of immunity challenges is probably the best competitor to ever play Nate's Survivor. He deserves the title of Sole Survivor. He won five immunity challenges. For me it is far more impressive to play a strategic game than winning a bunch of missions. That's true. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2013 18:41:06 GMT -5
Funny how me getting voted out changed the course of the game completely. Had you stayed this wouldn't be the final 2 I can assure you. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2013 18:44:29 GMT -5
Had you stayed this wouldn't be the final 2 I can assure you. Exactly, but I think we know who to thank for that.... |
|
|
|
Post by Nate on Aug 20, 2013 19:32:57 GMT -5
Usually the jury bases their decision on overall gameplay which is 75% strategic/social. But Daniel didn't just win challenges either so I think they are both very worthy of winning.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2013 19:55:33 GMT -5
I feel like Daniel did play strategically, he was just more quiet about it whereas Holly was more vocal about it
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2013 20:03:14 GMT -5
I feel like Daniel did play strategically, he was just more quiet about it whereas Holly was more vocal about it How would you know that? |
|
|
|
Post by JC on Aug 20, 2013 20:10:06 GMT -5
I feel like Daniel did play strategically, he was just more quiet about it whereas Holly was more vocal about it Exactly. If he was with holly and they made all decisions together like the three of them claim... Then they played the same social game. |
|
|
|
Post by Nate on Aug 20, 2013 20:13:07 GMT -5
Okay, I just realized the jurors keep posting here. No more of that please.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2013 20:13:25 GMT -5
I feel like Daniel did play strategically, he was just more quiet about it whereas Holly was more vocal about it How would you know that? i dont. But it seems that way from what everyone is saying, and their answers. |
|
|
|
Post by Brian on Aug 22, 2013 11:08:19 GMT -5
Nice job Holly!
I'm a little surprised that the vote wasn't a lot closer.
|
|
